Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Sarah Pearson <sarah AT creativecommons.org>]

Hi Anthony, 

Under v.3, licensees are obligated to provide the title of the work if doing so is "         reasonable to the medium or means." The small adjustment to this obligation in v. 4 is that licensees are obligated to provide the title of the work "in any reasonable manner based on the medium or means used." In both versions, the title is only required if it is supplied by the licensor. 

We're very interested in hearing thoughts on how this obligation works in practice (especially when it comes to attribution stacking issues), and welcome any ideas on how to improve it in later drafts. 

best,
Sarah

On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Anthony <osm AT inbox.org> wrote:

Section 3(a)(1)(iii)

We have to provide the title?  So if an adaptation has gone through 18
different title changes, we have to provide all the prior titles?

On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Diane Peters <diane AT creativecommons.org> wrote:
> We are pleased to announce that the first draft of 4.0 BY-NC-SA is ready for
> public comment.  Please see the announcement below.  We're eager to hear
> from you!
>
> http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/32157
>
> Diane

_______________________________________________
List info and archives at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-licenses

In consideration of people subscribed to this list to participate
in the CC licenses http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0 development
process, please direct unrelated discussions to the cc-community list
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community