Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Diane Peters <diane AT creativecommons.org>]

Hi Antoine,

Thanks for your email.  Compatibility and interoperability between licenses is a high priority for CC with v4.0.  We hope to progress those discussions during this first discussion period.

As relates to FAL in particular, we've been working on the compatibility issues between BY-SA and FAL on and off again over the past few years.   With the first draft of 4.0 now in public comment, we have re-started those conversations and are in contact with Antoine Moreau to discuss next steps.  Look for more information here and on the FAL discussion lists as we sort through those issues and look to our respective communities for guidance and input.

Diane

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:58 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis AT pitrou.net> wrote:

Dear Diane (and other readers),

> We are pleased to announce that the first draft of 4.0 BY-NC-SA is ready
> for public comment.  Please see the announcement below.  We're eager to
> hear from you!
>
> http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/32157

We are still waiting for some feedback on an official compatibility
statement with the Free Art License 1.3 (granted, for the BY-SA, not the
BY-NC-SA). Are there any plans to address this matter soon?

Even if you haven't taken a definitive stance yet, some feedback or
comments would be welcome.

See my original message at:
https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/cc-licenses/2011-December/006474.html

Best regards

Antoine.


_______________________________________________
List info and archives at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-licenses

In consideration of people subscribed to this list to participate
in the CC licenses http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0 development
process, please direct unrelated discussions to the cc-community list
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community

--