cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility with the Free Art License
- From: Valentin Villenave <valentin AT villenave.net>
- To: Development of Creative Commons licenses <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility with the Free Art License
- Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 20:05:45 +0100
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Rob Myers <rob AT robmyers.org> wrote:
> I think LAL 1.3 is more than good enough in itself and close enough to
> BY-SA that compatibility is something that could be considered now.
BTW Rob, still waiting for that "FAL weakens copyleft" blog post of yours :-)
Cheers,
Valentin.
-
[cc-licenses] Compatibility with the Free Art License,
Antoine Pitrou, 12/23/2011
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility with the Free Art License,
Rob Myers, 12/23/2011
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility with the Free Art License,
Valentin Villenave, 12/23/2011
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility with the Free Art License,
Rob Myers, 12/23/2011
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility with the Free Art License,
Luis Villa, 12/24/2011
- Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility with the Free Art License, Valentin Villenave, 12/24/2011
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility with the Free Art License,
Luis Villa, 12/24/2011
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility with the Free Art License,
Rob Myers, 12/23/2011
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility with the Free Art License,
Valentin Villenave, 12/23/2011
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility with the Free Art License,
Rob Myers, 12/23/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.