cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility with the Free Art License
- From: Rob Myers <rob AT robmyers.org>
- To: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility with the Free Art License
- Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 19:27:41 +0000
On 23/12/11 19:05, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Rob Myers <rob AT robmyers.org> wrote:
>> I think LAL 1.3 is more than good enough in itself and close enough to
>> BY-SA that compatibility is something that could be considered now.
>
> BTW Rob, still waiting for that "FAL weakens copyleft" blog post of yours
> :-)
It may have evaporated. The concerns I had are addressed by 1.3 as far
as I can tell. Yes, I hadn't looked at it for a while... :-)
- Rob.
-
[cc-licenses] Compatibility with the Free Art License,
Antoine Pitrou, 12/23/2011
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility with the Free Art License,
Rob Myers, 12/23/2011
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility with the Free Art License,
Valentin Villenave, 12/23/2011
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility with the Free Art License,
Rob Myers, 12/23/2011
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility with the Free Art License,
Luis Villa, 12/24/2011
- Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility with the Free Art License, Valentin Villenave, 12/24/2011
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility with the Free Art License,
Luis Villa, 12/24/2011
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility with the Free Art License,
Rob Myers, 12/23/2011
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility with the Free Art License,
Valentin Villenave, 12/23/2011
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility with the Free Art License,
Rob Myers, 12/23/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.