Development of Creative Commons licenses

[paola.dimaio AT gmail.com]

Paul


 this is not a question of licensing. you cant licenses
> someone to kill other people (unless you are the head of MI6 that
> is). as far as ik know killing people is governed by criminal law and
> generally not allowed (regardless of the recipe).

It was just an example, a 'metaphor' if you wish
let me give you another example: I have a piece of content and I am
happy for anyone to use it without asking permission under cc terms ,
except for websites that sell weapons and pornography.

e
> so then why do you want to use the CC licenses. sounds the standard
> all rights reserved approach suits your purposes fine?

because I do not require anyone to ask permission, except for (say)
the two examples above

the cc
> licenses are designed to give permission upfront  and as you are not
> willing to give permissions upfront based on the criteria offered by
> the cc licenses you are perfectly free to stick with all rights
> reserved copyright law

- I am perfectly free to change the criteria (and have my cc) or to
suggest that the licenses do actually consider adding new criteria for
future revisions


pdm



>
> as far as i understand it has never been the ambition (and for
> practical reasons it also should not be if you ask me) to offer
> personalized cc licenses. that kind of defies the whole puprpose of
> the system and therefore cc should not make a provision for that.
>
> best,
> paul
> --
> paul keller | knowledgeland
> t: +31205756720 | e: pk AT kl.nl | www.knowledgeland.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cc-licenses mailing list
> cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
>


-- 
Paola Di Maio
School of IT
www.mfu.ac.th
*********************************************