cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: "Charles Iliya Krempeaux" <supercanadian AT gmail.com>
- To: "Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts" <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] just share alike
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:19:57 -0700
Hello,
One advantage you get by doing this at the license level, is that the
"terms" of the license can be understood by machines.
(Having to use a "BY-SA" and then "waive" the "BY" part does NOT have this.)
See ya
On 4/26/07, Greg London <greglondon.1 AT gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/25/07, Terry Hancock <hancock AT anansispaceworks.com> wrote:
> Greg London wrote:
> > On 4/25/07, matt draghi <mattdraghi AT hotmail.com > wrote:
> >> Does anyone know if there is a license for share alike, not requiring
> >> attribution?
> >
> > You can use ShareAlike. And then simply not provide any attribution
> > information.
> > see paragraph 4.c of this:
> > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode
>
> Ick, no! People do this all the time, not usually with this intent. It
> just creates the impression that compliance is impossible.
For the record, I do not quite share Terry Hancock's vehemence on this
issue, however, he's not wrong...
I just wish the license contained the text that says how to provide
the information while specifcially waiving attribution as a requirement.
is "Attribution is waived for John Smith." enough?
Is it clear that this waiver should remain with the license as it passes
from one downstream user to the next? Is the "attribution is waived for John
Smith"
a waiver you have to attach to every copy of the work that gets passed around?
It is very unintuitive that you have to go out of your way doing extra
work to tell people they don't have to go out of their way to attribute you.
Alice waives attribution.
Bob creates a derivative but wants attribution.
Charlie wants to create a derivative and sees that Alice and Bob both
contributed to the current version. Unless the waiver specifically says
"Alice waives attribution", he won't know he doesn't have to waive it.
But that means that rather than waive attribution, you instead have to
make sure the waiver goes everywhere the work goes.
It's just a bit weird.
--
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
charles @ reptile.ca
supercanadian @ gmail.com
developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/
-
Re: [cc-licenses] just share alike
, (continued)
-
Re: [cc-licenses] just share alike,
Erik Moeller, 04/25/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] just share alike, Javier Candeira, 04/26/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] just share alike, Joachim Durchholz, 04/26/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] just share alike,
Greg London, 04/25/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] just share alike,
matt draghi, 04/25/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] just share alike, drew Roberts, 04/26/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] just share alike,
Terry Hancock, 04/25/2007
-
[cc-licenses] You can always give up more rights in a work.,
drew Roberts, 04/26/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] You can always give up more rights in a work., James Grimmelmann, 04/26/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] just share alike,
Greg London, 04/26/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] just share alike,
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, 04/26/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] just share alike,
James Grimmelmann, 04/26/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] just share alike, Mike Linksvayer, 04/26/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] just share alike, Joachim Durchholz, 04/26/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] just share alike,
James Grimmelmann, 04/26/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] just share alike,
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, 04/26/2007
-
[cc-licenses] You can always give up more rights in a work.,
drew Roberts, 04/26/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] just share alike,
matt draghi, 04/25/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] just share alike,
James Grimmelmann, 04/25/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] just share alike, matt draghi, 04/25/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] just share alike,
Erik Moeller, 04/25/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.