Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Mia Garlick <mia AT creativecommons.org>]

actually, i disagree....see e.g., clause 7(b) (referring to the BY  
license for ease of reference) confirms that: "Notwithstanding the  
above, Licensor reserves the right to release the Work under  
different license terms..."

the license is non-exclusive, thus it is perfectly acceptable for a  
licensor to offer one version under a CC license and one under  
separate licensing terms.

On Dec 14, 2006, at 4:14 AM, drew Roberts wrote:

> On Thursday 14 December 2006 02:55 am, Amit Yadav wrote:
> > hi all,
> > i wanted to know if it is possible to have a song file at say 128  
> > kbps
> > under CC license and have another file (of the same song) at say
> > 256kbps under Copyright (the usual "all rights reserved" one) when
> > both files are of the same recording….. ??
>
> I would like it if that were possible, I was trying the same thing  
> with
> pictures, I was told no. It is the "work" that is licenses, not an  
> instance
> of the work.
>
> I would still appreciate a better explanation of why it must be  
> this way.
> > thanks
> > Amit
>
> all the best,
>
> drew
> --
> (da idea man)
> National Novel Writing Month
> Sayings (Winner 2006)
> http://www.ourmedia.org/node/262954
> _______________________________________________
> cc-licenses mailing list
> cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses