cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses
- From: Rob Myers <rob AT robmyers.org>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses
- Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:18:39 +0100
Eric Garner wrote:
Why not break the non-TPA language out of the ND, NC, SA, etc. licenses and make it a completely separate option called "N-TPA" or something like that?
Because in my opinion TPMs are part of the general problem that needs to be solved, not a separate issue. TPMs prevent sharing *physically* (well, electronically), where copyright only prevents it legally. TPMs break SA most noticeably but they also break the free sharing of unmodified versions that is the basic freedom that all CC licenses give you. It does not make sense to treat TPMs separately any more than it would make sense to divide the CC licenses up into modules that tackle successive copyright acts.
- Rob.
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses
, (continued)
- Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses, Terry Hancock, 09/30/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses, drew Roberts, 09/30/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses, Rob Myers, 09/30/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses, Mia Garlick, 09/30/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses, Evan Prodromou, 09/30/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses, drew Roberts, 09/30/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses, Greg London, 09/30/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses, Evan Prodromou, 09/27/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses, drew Roberts, 09/27/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Respons$Cc: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org, MJ Ray, 09/28/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.