Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: [cc-licenses] Does this case falls under CC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5?

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Mia Garlick <mia AT creativecommons.org>
  • To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Does this case falls under CC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5?
  • Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 09:26:38 -0700


On Sep 7, 2006, at 9:22 AM, jblake AT eskimo.com wrote:


<cut>


One of the major problems with the CC-NC contract, is that there is no
precise legal definition that is applicable across the board of "non
commercial usage".

really? where is the second? i'm only aware of this one: http:// creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5752 (which is the same as that which appears on the wiki: http://wiki.creativecommons.org/ NonCommercial_Guidelines)

Compounding the issue is that there are two
different guidelines of what "non commercial" means on the CC website.
[One supersedes the other, but the old one does not point to the new
one.] Scattered around the net, are at least half a dozen
interpretations/understandings of what that contract means to the person
who is using the licence.

Given the extremely diverse interpretations of the CC-NC licence, it
appears that nobody is clear on what it permits, and what it restricts.

Note: I am not a lawyer.

xan

jonathon
_______________________________________________
cc-licenses mailing list
cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page