cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] Does this case falls under CC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5?
- From: LinuxLala <linuxlala AT gmail.com>
- To: "Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts" <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Does this case falls under CC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5?
- Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 19:59:19 +0530
Hi everybody,
Some time back, I had raised a similar issue where I described a situation in which a wiki article under CC-NC was published in a newspaper. The general consent on this list was that this is a violation, even though the newspaper is not making money directly from that one article.
In your case, the money is much higher than what a newspaper costs and while the charge is for bandwidth, I believe that it is a violation since they are making money from a situation where your CC-NC property is being used.
Again, I am not a lawyer nor CC.
On 9/7/06, Mia Garlick <mia AT creativecommons.org> wrote:
hey christoph,
the relevant intention as to what NC means here is yours - if you
feel that this is a commercial use then you can argue that it is.
two things that may assist you - in the recent Dutch case about the
applicability of CC licenses held that a commercial publisher
violated the NonCommercial license limitation when they used CC NC
licensed images in a magazine that was then sold to the public. <snip>
-
[cc-licenses] Does this case falls under CC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5?,
Christoph Boecken, 09/07/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Does this case falls under CC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5?, rob, 09/07/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Does this case falls under CC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5?,
Mia Garlick, 09/07/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Does this case falls under CC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5?, LinuxLala, 09/07/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Does this case falls under CC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5?,
jblake, 09/07/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Does this case falls under CC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5?,
Mia Garlick, 09/07/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Does this case falls underCC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5?,
Sincaglia, Nicolas, 09/07/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Does this case falls underCC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5?,
Rob Myers, 09/07/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Does this case fallsunderCC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5?, Sincaglia, Nicolas, 09/07/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Does this case falls underCC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5?,
Rob Myers, 09/07/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Does this case falls under CC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5?,
Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts, 09/07/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Does this case falls under CC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5?, Jonathon Blake, 09/11/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Does this case falls underCC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5?,
Sincaglia, Nicolas, 09/07/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Does this case falls under CC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5?,
Mia Garlick, 09/07/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.