Development of Creative Commons licenses

[drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>]

On Wednesday 20 July 2005 08:47 am, Evan Prodromou wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 06:41 -0400, drew Roberts wrote:
> > Attribution probably not, but Attribution-ShareAlike does have similar
> > issues for certain uses as I understand it. Of course, you may consider
> > this a feature where some would consider it a bug.
>
> Point taken. I think there's a qualitative difference.
>
> With NonCommercial, there are a slew of _uses_ that you can put Works to
> that you have to get separate permission for. As a practical matter,
> large-scale reproduction and distribution on physical media are almost
> impossible, as well as most kinds of public performance, public display,
> or broadcast.

Oh, I agree with you, I was just pointing out that for people wanting to do 
things in a non-free way, that BY-SA had some infinite iterations issues as 
well.
>
> With ShareAlike, you just have to keep your derivative works copylefted.
> It disallows you from setting monopolistic prices, but it doesn't put a
> practical limit on what you can do with the work. As far as I know;
> there's probably a good point to make here.
>
> > Bam Sookie!
>
> I like this.
>
> ~Evan

all the best,

drew

-- 
http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=creator%3A%22drew%20Roberts%22