Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Daniel Carrera <dcarrera AT digitaldistribution.com>]

Greg London wrote:
> CC hasn't clarified what exactly "commercial" means
> on the grounds that explaining their licenses
> is legal advice.

Doesn't that defeat the purpose of the CC?
For me, the #1 selling point is that the licenses are supposed to be 
clear and fairly well understood. I am not a lawyer, and I don't want to 
get a law degree before I can do useful work. I am, however, willing to 
read FAQs, join lists and do work to understand the licenses. But if the 
makers of the license don't write FAQs, and doing join lists, what am I 
to do?

<not-serious>Maybe it'd be better to stick to /all/ rights reserved. At 
least I know what that one means.</not-serious>

Cheers,
Daniel.