Development of Creative Commons licenses

[drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>]

On Wednesday 06 April 2005 10:22 am, Peter Brink wrote:
> drew Roberts skrev:
> > "
> >
> > : a license granted by a licensee that grants some or all of the rights
> > : (as to
> >
> > a patent) acquired under the original license"
> >
> > Fine, but in context, doesn't the "all of the rights" part happen
> > automatically as part of the original license?
>
> Yes - that is covered by the License Grant (item 3 in the license).
>
> > If I release a work CC BY, the people who get the work and the rights
> > from me cannot give the work to others with those same rights? That makes
> > no sense.
>
> They cannot both distribute a work under a) the same license *and* b)
> sublicense the work under different terms.

Who said under different terms? Did you look at the link? Do you know that 
the 
restriction mentioned must refer to different terms? If so, please clear that 
point up for the rest of us if you can.

The site in question says you can't include a CC BY work in a "royalty-free 
music collection" ("This music may not be resold as part of a royalty-free 
music collection.")

Couldn't a collection on CD of CC BY and BY-SA songs be considered a 
"royalty-free music collection?" You could make free use of them so long as 
you abided by the BY and BY-SA conditions could you not? Or does 
"royalty-free music collection" have some special legal or industry meaning 
that some of us are not aware of?

all the best,

drew