cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights"
- From: drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights"
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:41:07 -0500
On Tuesday 29 March 2005 11:26 am, Peter Brink wrote:
> Rob Myers skrev:
> > But a conditionalised license would *not* prevent you from asserting your
> > rights, it would just remove your license to the work if you did. So
> >
> > your rights are unaffected. Whether this would be problematic in
> > any given jurisdiction I couldn't say.
>
> The problem is that a mandatory rule is protected from being made part
> of a contract, you are simply not allowed to use such a condition.
>
> Here in Sweden you may not swap benefits protected by mandatory rules
> (and moral rights are an excellent example of such a benefit) with
> another benefit. That is - if you offer the benefit of being able to
> freely distribute copies and derivative works you may *not* make that
> offer dependent upon a waiver of moral rights...
>
> /Peter Brink
It is comming clearer now, that right cannot be included in a contract. (And
in Sweden, all licneses are considered contracts?) So it remains to be seen
whether people from each side can figure out how to play nicely with those on
the other to the benefit of the community. Like I brought up elsewhere, I
wonder how religion will play in this.
Examples of almost sensible moral rights assertions that failed in court
would
be useful to help those from nmrcs (non-moral rights countries) understand
the rules of the game.
all the best,
drew
-
Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights"
, (continued)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Greg London, 03/31/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", drew Roberts, 03/28/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", drew Roberts, 03/28/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Peter Brink, 03/29/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", drew Roberts, 03/29/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Greg London, 03/29/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Rob Myers, 03/29/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Greg London, 03/29/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", drew Roberts, 03/29/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Peter Brink, 03/29/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", drew Roberts, 03/29/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", drew Roberts, 03/29/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Peter Brink, 03/29/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", drew Roberts, 03/29/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Peter Brink, 03/29/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", drew Roberts, 03/29/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Greg London, 03/29/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Peter Brink, 03/29/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Greg London, 03/29/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Evan Prodromou, 03/29/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Henri Sivonen, 03/31/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.