cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights"
- From: Peter Brink <peter.brink AT brinkdata.se>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights"
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:19:46 +0200
drew Roberts skrev:
So you think if I crafted a license where the original author granted a BY-SA type license to make derivatives so long as the maker of derivatives did not invoke their moral rights, but that if they should invoke their moral rights anywhere, they would lose the rights the original author granted under the license, that such a license would be held invalid in Europe?
A creator of a original work or derivative work under such a license in Europe would still be entitled to moral rights in those jurisdictions who honor them.
Remember - moral rights are mandatory. In Sweden a condition in a
contract which violates a mandatory law or rule is by default considered
being unlawful. Ergo - you would not be able to enforce such a condition
in court. Designing a license knowing that it might be in part
considered unlawful is a bad idea, not to mention that it would stain
the reputation of CC.
IMO it is not possible to get around moral rights! Which is precisely
what the law makers intended...
> They would force the original author to give rights to their work
> under conditions which they did not agree with?
>
Yes. Since the original author included unlawful terms in the contract he will be forced to accept a contract under different terms than he intended.
/Peter Brink
-
Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights"
, (continued)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Peter Brink, 03/28/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Greg London, 03/28/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", drew Roberts, 03/28/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Alex Schroeder, 03/28/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Greg London, 03/28/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Alex Schroeder, 03/29/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Alex Schroeder, 03/30/2005
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Greg London, 03/31/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", drew Roberts, 03/28/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", drew Roberts, 03/28/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Peter Brink, 03/29/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", drew Roberts, 03/29/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Greg London, 03/29/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Rob Myers, 03/29/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Greg London, 03/29/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", drew Roberts, 03/29/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Peter Brink, 03/29/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", drew Roberts, 03/29/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", drew Roberts, 03/29/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Peter Brink, 03/29/2005
- Re: [cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", drew Roberts, 03/29/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.