cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: "Branko Collin" <collin AT xs4all.nl>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: CC licenses and "moral rights"
- Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:15:58 +0100
On 25 Mar 2005, at 11:55, Peter Brink wrote:
Branko Collin skrev:
> > On 24 Mar 2005, at 13:35, Peter Brink wrote:
> >
> >>the license is a contractual agreement between the
> >>licensor and the licensee.
> >
> > Why do you say that? Do you have any proof for this? I have never
> > heard of contracts that can be made by just one of the two parties
> > involved. That would certainly set a most dangerous precedent.
>
> There are loads of such contracts - insurances are a good example,
> shrinkwrap licenses are another.
>
> There are specific rules for how unilaterally drafted contracts are
> interpreted under contact law, the reason is of course to protect the
> other, weaker, party who have had no way of influencing the language
> of the deed.
I am sorry, but if you cannot and will not name a single law or case
to back you up, I cannot take you seriously.
--
branko collin
collin AT xs4all.nl
-
Re: Public Domain dedication
, (continued)
- Re: Public Domain dedication, drew Roberts, 03/27/2005
- Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Peter Brink, 03/25/2005
- Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", drew Roberts, 03/25/2005
- Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Robin Millette, 03/24/2005
- Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Peter Brink, 03/24/2005
- Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Robin Millette, 03/24/2005
- Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Branko Collin, 03/24/2005
- Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Peter Brink, 03/25/2005
- Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", drew Roberts, 03/25/2005
- Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Branko Collin, 03/26/2005
- Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Peter Brink, 03/27/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.