Development of Creative Commons licenses

[drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>]

On Thursday 24 March 2005 10:12 pm, Greg London wrote:
> drew Roberts said:
> > If I release a poem CC BY-SA, I would want to see all collections where
> > it appears to be CC BY-SA.
>
> aggregations and collections are not derivatives
> therefore share alike does not apply to the collection.
> It would still apply to your individual piece though.
>
> An aggregation would only require the right to copy
> and distribute, which means sharealike would consider
> your work sandwiched into a book of other works to
> be a verbatim copy that happens to be transmitted
> in bulk with a bunch of other works.

Is there a way to fix this in the license so that aggregation can only occur 
with like licensed works? That is, put conditions on the right to copy?
>
> But that also means that an aggregation would be
> restricted by NonCommercial and Attribution
> which are license requirements that affect
> distribution.

How would NC come into CC BY-SA? (See above.) If somehow it does, that would 
limit some of my issues.
>
> Just because someone aggregates doesn't make your
> license requirements go away. It just means they
> don't have to have the right to create derivative
> works when they aggregate.

all the best,

drew