Development of Creative Commons licenses

["Todd A. Jacobs" <nospam AT codegnome.org>]

On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 06:28:10AM -0500, Daniel Carrera wrote:

> Debian considers non-free is the presence of invariant sections. You
> an see why. Suppose someone gives you an FDL document with an
> invariant section equal to the entire document. It's already happened.

The invariant sections are optional, so you could simply require
documents to contain no invariant sections.

Anyway, in some respects I find the FDL to be superior to the CC
licenses, but it is much harder to grok, and doesn't really provide the
same "spectrum of rights." Maybe your best bet is just to use a modified
CC-BY, and simply call it something else.

-- 
Find my Techno-Geek Journal at http://www.codegnome.org/geeklog/