cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: "Todd A. Jacobs" <nospam AT codegnome.org>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: distribution of licenses
- Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 21:40:29 -0800
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 12:43:49AM -0500, Greg London wrote:
> The second biggest slice is NonCommercial-NoDerivatives, and I suppose
> CC-NC-SA is less resrictive than CC-NC-ND, but i can't see any real
> world difference between CC-NC-SA and plain CC-NC.
There's a huge difference. BY-NC doesn't prevent commercialization of
derivative works, while BY-NC-SA does.
--
Find my Techno-Geek Journal at http://www.codegnome.org/geeklog/
-
Re: Downstream relicensing
, (continued)
- Re: Downstream relicensing, Greg London, 03/09/2005
- Re: Downstream relicensing, drew Roberts, 03/09/2005
- Re: Downstream relicensing, Greg London, 03/09/2005
- Re: Downstream relicensing, Branko Collin, 03/09/2005
- Re: Downstream relicensing, drew Roberts, 03/09/2005
- Re: Downstream relicensing, Rob Myers, 03/09/2005
- Re: Downstream relicensing, Branko Collin, 03/09/2005
- Re: Downstream relicensing, drew Roberts, 03/07/2005
- Re: distribution of licenses, drew Roberts, 03/07/2005
- Re: distribution of licenses, Todd A. Jacobs, 03/08/2005
-
Re: distribution of licenses,
Branko Collin, 03/01/2005
-
Re: distribution of licenses,
Evan Prodromou, 03/01/2005
-
Re: distribution of licenses,
Greg London, 03/01/2005
- Re: distribution of licenses, Branko Collin, 03/01/2005
-
Re: distribution of licenses,
Greg London, 03/01/2005
-
Re: distribution of licenses,
Todd A. Jacobs, 03/05/2005
- Re: distribution of licenses, drew Roberts, 03/05/2005
-
Re: distribution of licenses,
Evan Prodromou, 03/01/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.