cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Evan Prodromou <evan AT wikitravel.org>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Attribution discussion (was Re: Attribution War)
- Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 14:53:11 -0400
>>>>> "GL" == Greg London <email AT greglondon.com> writes:
GL> Alice creates a song, licenses it CC-NC, and forgoes any
GL> attribution requirements. Bob mixes Alice's song into his own
GL> song, license his song CC-NC, and wants attribution.
ITYM he licenses it by-nc, at that point. Or perhaps that's not what
you mean. Do you really mean that he licenses it nc 1.0, and simply
_requests_ attribution?
GL> Charlie puts Bob's song in his CC-NC movie short.
It's unclear to me whether Charlie can release a movie short under
just nc if Bob put his stuff under by-nc. I'm guessing the question is
whether Charlie's movie is a single derivative work or a collective
work (I think probably the second). But that's another kettle of fish,
and I figure you probably meant that Charlie would license under by-nc
also.
GL> At the end of the movie, the credits roll, and you see
GL> Screenplay : Charlie
GL> Soundtrack : Bob
GL> after all the credits roll, you see a screen dump of all the
GL> copyright notices, including one for Alice.
Why does Charlie have Alice's copyright notice in there? nc 1.0
doesn't require the copyright notice to be shown.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/nc/1.0/legalcode
Does he do it out of thoughtfulness and generosity?
GL> If Charlie's movie uses metadata to carry copyright notice
GL> information, then you wouldn't even see Alice's name anywhere
GL> in the movie. It would simply tag along in the metadata.
Or not. AFAICT, he doesn't have to include it anywhere.
~ESP
--
Evan Prodromou <evan AT wikitravel.org>
Wikitravel - http://wikitravel.org/en/
The free, complete, up-to-date and reliable world-wide travel guide
-
2.0,
Glenn Otis Brown, 05/25/2004
- Re: 2.0, Rob Myers, 05/26/2004
- Re: 2.0, Peter Prohaska, 05/26/2004
-
Attribution War,
Greg London, 05/26/2004
- Re: Attribution War, Glenn Otis Brown, 05/26/2004
-
Re: Attribution War,
Evan Prodromou, 05/27/2004
-
Re: Attribution War,
Greg London, 05/27/2004
-
Attribution discussion (was Re: Attribution War),
Evan Prodromou, 05/27/2004
-
Message not available
-
Re: Attribution discussion (was Re: Attribution War),
Greg London, 05/27/2004
- Re: Attribution discussion, Evan Prodromou, 05/27/2004
- Re: Attribution discussion, Greg London, 05/27/2004
- Re: Attribution discussion, Evan Prodromou, 05/27/2004
-
Re: Attribution discussion (was Re: Attribution War),
Greg London, 05/27/2004
- Re: Attribution discussion (was Re: Attribution War), Rob Myers, 05/29/2004
-
Message not available
-
Attribution discussion (was Re: Attribution War),
Evan Prodromou, 05/27/2004
-
Re: Attribution War,
Greg London, 05/27/2004
-
Re: In Sync,
Glenn Otis Brown, 05/26/2004
-
Re: In Sync,
Evan Prodromou, 05/26/2004
-
Re: In Sync,
Greg London, 05/26/2004
- Re: In Sync, Glenn Otis Brown, 05/26/2004
-
Re: In Sync,
Greg London, 05/26/2004
-
Re: In Sync,
Evan Prodromou, 05/26/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.