cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Peter Brink <peter.brink AT brinkdata.se>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: Strange Creative Commons Licence problem.
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 09:25:14 +0200
fredag 16 april 2004 08:34 skrev Greg London:
> (3) have you looked at the Open-Gaming-License?
>
I would not want to recommend the OGL over a CC license at all. OGL cannot
really be called an Open Content license, it allows the licensor to close
elements which are not possible to own from a IP law perspective. It also
includes a general ,and thus very far reaching, restriction in the licensees
right to indicate co-adaptability and compatibility with any trademark. Being
able to indicate co-adaptability and compatibility with another game is
essential when dealing with role-playing games.
I would at all costs avoid the OGL.
-
Strange Creative Commons Licence problem.,
Brian Boyko, 04/16/2004
-
Re: Strange Creative Commons Licence problem.,
Greg London, 04/16/2004
-
Re: Strange Creative Commons Licence problem.,
Peter Brink, 04/16/2004
- Re: Strange Creative Commons Licence problem., Per I. Mathisen, 04/16/2004
-
Re: Strange Creative Commons Licence problem.,
Peter Brink, 04/16/2004
- Re: Strange Creative Commons Licence problem., Tom Morris, 04/16/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: Strange Creative Commons Licence problem.,
Rob Myers, 04/16/2004
- Re: Strange Creative Commons Licence problem., Peter Brink, 04/16/2004
- Re: Strange Creative Commons Licence problem., Rob Myers, 04/16/2004
-
Re: Strange Creative Commons Licence problem.,
Rob Myers, 04/16/2004
- Re: Strange Creative Commons Licence problem., Greg London, 04/16/2004
-
Re: Strange Creative Commons Licence problem.,
Greg London, 04/16/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.