cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Re: commercial performance under at-nc-sa

From: Evan Prodromou <evan AT wikitravel.org>
To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: commercial performance under at-nc-sa
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 23:41:25 -0500

>>>>> "GL" == Greg London <email AT greglondon.com> writes:

>> not all performers will have the same interest in copyleft that
>> some of us do, and so, as a composer, it is not with in my
>> rights to say that 'all recordings of my music will be released
>> under a particularly open license.'

GL> applying 'copyleft' to musical scores would not require
GL> performances to be licensed the same as the score.

Actually, I believe that Creative Commons licenses explicitly allow
performance of works.

~ESP

--
Evan Prodromou <evan AT wikitravel.org>
Wikitravel - http://www.wikitravel.org/
The free, complete, up-to-date and reliable world-wide travel guide

commercial performance under at-nc-sa, Andrew Gianni, 03/20/2004
- Re: commercial performance under at-nc-sa, Evan Prodromou, 03/20/2004
- Re: commercial performance under at-nc-sa, email, 03/21/2004
- new license request CC-FA, email, 03/21/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- commercial performance under at-nc-sa, Douglas Boyce, 03/28/2004
  - Re: commercial performance under at-nc-sa, Rob Myers, 03/28/2004
  - Re: commercial performance under at-nc-sa, Greg London, 03/28/2004
    - Re: commercial performance under at-nc-sa, Evan Prodromou, 03/29/2004
    - Re: commercial performance under at-nc-sa, Romain d'Alverny, 03/29/2004
      - Re: commercial performance under at-nc-sa, Greg London, 03/29/2004
        
        Re: commercial performance under at-nc-sa, Romain d'Alverny, 03/29/2004