cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: email AT greglondon.com
- To: "Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts" <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Cc: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: commercial performance under at-nc-sa
- Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 17:47:54 -0500 (EST)
Andrew Gianni said:
> we aren't expecting to receive royalties if our works
> are performed (often by our colleagues at dances)
> but would like to be compensated if our compositions are
> recorded or possibly if they are published in print.
if your colleagues at dances dont charge admission,
then at-nc-sa should do what you want. If they do,
why pass up on milking that cash cow? Just license
it "All rights reserved" and be done with it.
-
commercial performance under at-nc-sa,
Andrew Gianni, 03/20/2004
- Re: commercial performance under at-nc-sa, Evan Prodromou, 03/20/2004
- Re: commercial performance under at-nc-sa, email, 03/21/2004
- new license request CC-FA, email, 03/21/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
commercial performance under at-nc-sa,
Douglas Boyce, 03/28/2004
- Re: commercial performance under at-nc-sa, Rob Myers, 03/28/2004
-
Re: commercial performance under at-nc-sa,
Greg London, 03/28/2004
- Re: commercial performance under at-nc-sa, Evan Prodromou, 03/29/2004
-
Re: commercial performance under at-nc-sa,
Romain d'Alverny, 03/29/2004
-
Re: commercial performance under at-nc-sa,
Greg London, 03/29/2004
- Re: commercial performance under at-nc-sa, Romain d'Alverny, 03/29/2004
-
Re: commercial performance under at-nc-sa,
Greg London, 03/29/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.