cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Evan Prodromou <evan AT wikitravel.org>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: NoDerivatives
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 05:13:32 -0500
I have a quick question about ND content.
Some Open Source software is not modifiable -- you're not allowed to
change the source, even if it's available to you. TeX is a good
example. But you _can_ distribute patch files along with the source,
and end users can use the patches to modify the source themselves.
I take it that this isn't possible with ND content. Even if the
document remains unmodified during redistribution, the patch would be
a derivative work. Or the patch + document would be a derivative work.
Is this correct? Incorrect?
~ESP
--
Evan Prodromou <evan AT wikitravel.org>
Wikitravel - http://www.wikitravel.org/
The free, complete, up-to-date and reliable world-wide travel guide
-
NoDerivatives,
Evan Prodromou, 03/18/2004
-
Re: NoDerivatives,
Wouter Vanden Hove, 03/18/2004
- Re: NoDerivatives, email, 03/18/2004
- Re: NoDerivatives, Evan Prodromou, 03/18/2004
-
Re: NoDerivatives,
Wouter Vanden Hove, 03/18/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.