Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Wouter Vanden Hove <wouter.vanden.hove AT pandora.be>]

Op do 18-03-2004, om 11:13 schreef Evan Prodromou:
> I have a quick question about ND content.
> 
> Some Open Source software is not modifiable -- you're not allowed to
> change the source, even if it's available to you. TeX is a good
> example. But you _can_ distribute patch files along with the source,
> and end users can use the patches to modify the source themselves.
> 
> I take it that this isn't possible with ND content. Even if the
> document remains unmodified during redistribution, 

> the patch would be a derivative work.
No.
for example, you distribute a ND picture + a recipe how to apply some
edits or filters in a photo editing program.

The recipe is not a derived work of the picture, but the result is.
But with ND you can't distribute the picture, or even put it on your own
website.

>  Or the patch + document would be a derivative work.
Yes, sort of. 
the resulting document of applying the patch to the document is the
derivative work.


Wouter, IANAL

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend