cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: CC licence options in relation to LGPL and Mozilla 1.1. Open Source licences
- From: Mike Linksvayer <ml AT creativecommons.org>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: CC licence options in relation to LGPL and Mozilla 1.1. Open Source licences
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:58:34 -0800
Jorn Bettin wrote:
> Not sure how we can express in proper legal terms that
any modification of our source code requires the result to be Open Source as
well, bound by the same licence, and that in contrast any use (commercial or
non-commercial) of the unaltered software can occur in non Open Source
format.
As you noted, it seems like the LGPL does this.
Our requirements seem not to be covered by any of the available CC
licences, but rather represent a mix of two of the CC licencing options.
The available CC licenses are each a mix of the CC licensing options. All non-mutually-exclusive option combinations are available. See <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/> for a list.
--
Mike Linksvayer
http://creativecommons.org/learn/aboutus/people#21
-
CC licence options in relation to LGPL and Mozilla 1.1. Open Source licences,
Jorn Bettin, 01/13/2004
-
Re: CC licence options in relation to LGPL and Mozilla 1.1. Open Source licences,
Evan Prodromou, 01/14/2004
-
Re: CC licence options in relation to LGPL and Mozilla 1.1. Open Source licences,
Jorn Bettin, 01/14/2004
- Re: CC licence options in relation to LGPL and Mozilla 1.1. Open Source licences, J.B. Nicholson-Owens, 01/14/2004
-
Re: CC licence options in relation to LGPL and Mozilla 1.1. Open Source licences,
Jorn Bettin, 01/14/2004
- Re: CC licence options in relation to LGPL and Mozilla 1.1. Open Source licences, Mike Linksvayer, 01/14/2004
-
Re: CC licence options in relation to LGPL and Mozilla 1.1. Open Source licences,
Evan Prodromou, 01/14/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.