cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: CC licence options in relation to LGPL and Mozilla 1.1. Open Source licences
- From: Evan Prodromou <evan AT wikitravel.org>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Cc: jorn.bettin AT softmetaware.com
- Subject: Re: CC licence options in relation to LGPL and Mozilla 1.1. Open Source licences
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:04:27 -0500
>>>>> "JB" == Jorn Bettin <jorn.bettin AT softmetaware.com> writes:
JB> Our requirements seem not to be covered by any of the
JB> available CC licences, but rather represent a mix of two of
JB> the CC licencing options.
Actually, unless there's something you're not mentioning --
documentation, maybe? -- none of the current licenses from Creative
Commons are appropriate for you. CC licenses are less than ideal
for software. See:
http://creativecommons.org/faq#faq_entry_3646
~ESP
P.S. I am not a lawyer, I don't speak for Creative Commons.
--
Evan Prodromou <evan AT wikitravel.org>
Wikitravel - http://www.wikitravel.org/
The free, complete, up-to-date and reliable world-wide travel guide
-
CC licence options in relation to LGPL and Mozilla 1.1. Open Source licences,
Jorn Bettin, 01/13/2004
-
Re: CC licence options in relation to LGPL and Mozilla 1.1. Open Source licences,
Evan Prodromou, 01/14/2004
-
Re: CC licence options in relation to LGPL and Mozilla 1.1. Open Source licences,
Jorn Bettin, 01/14/2004
- Re: CC licence options in relation to LGPL and Mozilla 1.1. Open Source licences, J.B. Nicholson-Owens, 01/14/2004
-
Re: CC licence options in relation to LGPL and Mozilla 1.1. Open Source licences,
Jorn Bettin, 01/14/2004
- Re: CC licence options in relation to LGPL and Mozilla 1.1. Open Source licences, Mike Linksvayer, 01/14/2004
-
Re: CC licence options in relation to LGPL and Mozilla 1.1. Open Source licences,
Evan Prodromou, 01/14/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.