Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Lorenzo De Tomasi <lorenzo.detomasi AT creativecommons.it>]

Giovedì, 4 Dic 2003, alle 22:39 Europe/Rome, Mike Linksvayer ha scritto:

> Evan Prodromou wrote:
> > So, in the FAQ on creativecommons.org, and on the "Licenses explained"
> > page, the GNU Free Documentation License is recommended for software
> > documentation.
> > However, there's no explanation for why this is so. It'd be nice to
> > have a page saying why the FDL is recommended, and especially why it's
> > recommended over any of the Creative Commons licenses.
>
> - The GFDL is specifically tailored for software documentation
> - It already has a substantial following in that domain
> - CC doesn't want to compete with the FSF

Ok :-)
I have found this doc on the web that focuses on some problems of 
Gnu-Fdl: http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html
Are they true problems?
If yes, why not thinking about developing a new CC Gnu-Fdl 
documentation license?

Thank you,

Lorenzo, iCommons Italy creative initiatives