Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-devel - Re: [cc-devel] Malformed HTML in CC licences

cc-devel AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Developer discussion for Creative Commons technology and tools

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Jonathan Palecek <jonathan AT creativecommons.org>
  • To: Nathan Yergler <nathan AT yergler.net>
  • Cc: cc-devel AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [cc-devel] Malformed HTML in CC licences
  • Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:57:52 -0600

Most of the anchor tags with name attrs are actually found in the
translations themselves and not in the deed templates, and can't be
changed easily right now. So, it will have to wait until later.

On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Jonathan Palecek
<jonathan AT creativecommons.org> wrote:
> Alright;  normal deeds pass the w3c validation tool now without
> warnings or anything.  Deeds for public domain tools will have a
> single attribute error, which I will remove shortly.
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Nathan Yergler <nathan AT yergler.net> wrote:
>> No good reason that I can imagine, probably just legacy (ie, leftover
>> from before there was an XHTML+RDFa doctype). Don't open a bug, just
>> fix it :).
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Jonathan Palecek
>> <jonathan AT creativecommons.org> wrote:
>>> Ignoring the attribute errors, the deeds should be well-formed now.
>>>
>>> The template file common to most of the deeds and the one common to
>>> the public domain tool use different doctypes from one another.  In
>>> the later case, the doctype is xhtml+rdfa.  I've opened up a new bug
>>> ticket for this - code.creativecommons.org/issues/issue1010
>>>
>>> If the doctype xhtml+rdfa was used, then it should be possible to have
>>> no validation issues what so ever.  Would there be a good reason not
>>> to do this?
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cc-devel mailing list
>>> cc-devel AT lists.ibiblio.org
>>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page