cc-devel AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Developer discussion for Creative Commons technology and tools
List archive
- From: Jonathan Palecek <jonathan AT creativecommons.org>
- To: Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber AT dustycloud.org>
- Cc: cc-devel AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [cc-devel] Malformed HTML in CC licences
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:46:24 -0600
Ignoring the attribute errors, the deeds should be well-formed now.
The template file common to most of the deeds and the one common to
the public domain tool use different doctypes from one another. In
the later case, the doctype is xhtml+rdfa. I've opened up a new bug
ticket for this - code.creativecommons.org/issues/issue1010
If the doctype xhtml+rdfa was used, then it should be possible to have
no validation issues what so ever. Would there be a good reason not
to do this?
-
[cc-devel] Malformed HTML in CC licences,
Richard Smith, 01/04/2012
-
Re: [cc-devel] Malformed HTML in CC licences,
Nathan Yergler, 01/05/2012
-
Re: [cc-devel] Malformed HTML in CC licences,
Richard Smith, 01/05/2012
-
Re: [cc-devel] Malformed HTML in CC licences,
Christopher Allan Webber, 01/05/2012
-
Re: [cc-devel] Malformed HTML in CC licences,
Jonathan Palecek, 01/10/2012
-
Re: [cc-devel] Malformed HTML in CC licences,
Nathan Yergler, 01/10/2012
-
Re: [cc-devel] Malformed HTML in CC licences,
Jonathan Palecek, 01/10/2012
- Re: [cc-devel] Malformed HTML in CC licences, Jonathan Palecek, 01/10/2012
-
Re: [cc-devel] Malformed HTML in CC licences,
Jonathan Palecek, 01/10/2012
- Re: [cc-devel] Malformed HTML in CC licences, Richard Smith, 01/10/2012
-
Re: [cc-devel] Malformed HTML in CC licences,
Nathan Yergler, 01/10/2012
-
Re: [cc-devel] Malformed HTML in CC licences,
Jonathan Palecek, 01/10/2012
-
Re: [cc-devel] Malformed HTML in CC licences,
Christopher Allan Webber, 01/05/2012
-
Re: [cc-devel] Malformed HTML in CC licences,
Richard Smith, 01/05/2012
-
Re: [cc-devel] Malformed HTML in CC licences,
Nathan Yergler, 01/05/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.