Developer discussion for Creative Commons technology and tools

[Jonathan Palecek <jonathan AT creativecommons.org>]

Alright;  normal deeds pass the w3c validation tool now without
warnings or anything.  Deeds for public domain tools will have a
single attribute error, which I will remove shortly.


On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Nathan Yergler <nathan AT yergler.net> wrote:
> No good reason that I can imagine, probably just legacy (ie, leftover
> from before there was an XHTML+RDFa doctype). Don't open a bug, just
> fix it :).
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Jonathan Palecek
> <jonathan AT creativecommons.org> wrote:
>> Ignoring the attribute errors, the deeds should be well-formed now.
>>
>> The template file common to most of the deeds and the one common to
>> the public domain tool use different doctypes from one another.  In
>> the later case, the doctype is xhtml+rdfa.  I've opened up a new bug
>> ticket for this - code.creativecommons.org/issues/issue1010
>>
>> If the doctype xhtml+rdfa was used, then it should be possible to have
>> no validation issues what so ever.  Would there be a good reason not
>> to do this?
>> _______________________________________________
>> cc-devel mailing list
>> cc-devel AT lists.ibiblio.org
>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel