cc-ca AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Creative Commons Canada
List archive
Re: [Cc-ca] Concerns: Copyright Act s. 57 and s. 14
- From: "Howard Knopf" <Howard.Knopf AT macerajarzyna.com>
- To: <cc-ca AT lists.ibiblio.org>, <akaplanmyrth AT ogilvyrenault.com>, <CCraig AT osgoode.yorku.ca>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [Cc-ca] Concerns: Copyright Act s. 57 and s. 14
- Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 17:03:36 -0400
Carys:
In my chapter, I discuss a point raised by Richard Gold that deals with s. 57 and issues involving the rights of licensees against subsequent third party purchasers of copyright. This is admittedly in the context of security interests and bankruptcy but it may be that Andy has raised a valid issue here....
In the chapter, I said the following and I've attached a PDF of a couple of pages for everyone's convenience - which cites Richard's article:
Sorry I don't have more time now to consider this, but hopefully these references will save others' time......
Howard
********************************
Howard P. Knopf Professor of Law, John Marhsall Law School, Chicago, Illinois ------------------------------------------- Of Counsel, Macera & Jarzyna/Moffat & Co. Suite 1200 427 Laurier Avenue West Ottawa, Canada K1R 7Y2 Phone: 613-238-8173 Fax: 613-235-2508 E-mail: howard.knopf AT macerajarzyna.com Website: http://www.macerajarzyna.com *********************************************************** This correspondence is intended for the person to whom it is addressed and contains information that is confidential, and/or privileged to the named recipient, and may be proprietary in nature. It is not to be used by any other person and/or organization. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and/or return e-mail. >>> Carys Craig/osgoode <CCraig AT osgoode.yorku.ca> 19-Jul-04 5:40:28 pm >>> Hello all, These are both good points and worth considering, but I'm not convinced that they present problems for the CC license. Both section 14(1) and section 57(3) apply only to assignments of copyright and 'grants of interest' in the copyright. While an exclusive license would constitute a "grant of an interest in a copyright" as per s. 13(7), I believe it's generally agreed that non-exclusive licenses, and arguably even sole licenses, do not amount to the grant of an interest in the copyright per se, but merely authorization or consent allowing the licensee to do certain otherwise infringing acts in relation to the work. The CC license is described as non-exclusive, and the licensor apparently retains the right to license the work to other parties; as I understand it, this does not amount to "a license granting an interest". As such, I don't think that these provisions threaten to restrict or undermine the terms of the license. Cheers, Carys ps. Apologies, Howard, if there's something from your chapter that I'm missing -- 57(3) has always bothered me, so I'll be checking your book out the library tomorrow! Carys Craig Assistant Professor Osgoode Hall Law School 4700 Keele Street Toronto, Ontario, M3J 1P3 416 736 5189 ccraig AT osgoode.yorku.ca "Kaplan-Myrth, Andy" <akaplanmyrth@ogilvyr To: <cc-ca AT lists.ibiblio.org> enault.com> cc: Sent by: Subject: [Cc-ca] Concerns: Copyright Act s. 57 and s. 14 cc-ca-bounces AT lists.i biblio.org 19/07/2004 09:41 AM Hi all, There are two concerns with the draft licence that I'd like to raise. s. 14(1) of the Act provides that any assignments or grants of interests in a copyrighted work is inoperative beyond 25 years after the death of the author. This must include a CC licence. You can't get around this by including some sort of waiver in the licence, because the Act provides that, "notwithstanding any agreement to the contrary", interests revert to the estate of the author. This is only true where the author is the first copyright owner, but that will almost always be the case for CC works. Maybe this isn't a fundamental concern, but it might be worth pointing out somewhere (since people don't generally know about this provision) that the licence will not be in effect for the duration of the applicable copyright (as you state in CCC s. 3), but rather for 25 years past the death of the author-owner. s. 57(3) provides that "any licence granting an interest in a copyright ... shall be adjudged void against any subsequent ... licensee for valuable consideration without actual notice, unless the prior ... licence is registered ... before the registering of the instrument under which the subsequent ... licensee claims". By my reading (please correct me if I'm wrong!), this means that a CC licensor can revoke the CC licence by simply granting another licence. The fact that the prior licence said it was perpetual may not stand up against the operation of s. 57 given the presence of a subsequent licence. There may be caselaw on that point -- unregistered prior assignment versus subsequent assignment granting rights before expiration of the prior assignment. Are there any other provisions lurking in the Copyright Act that might cause a CC licence to terminate early? Andy Kaplan-Myrth Student at Law, Ogilvy Renault Law Student, University of Ottawa 613-780-8670 akaplanmyrth AT ogilvyrenault.com -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality Message This e-mail message is confidential, may be privileged and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee. Any other person is strictly prohibited from disclosing, distributing or reproducing it. If the addressee cannot be reached or is unknown to you, please inform the sender by return e-mail immediately and delete this e-mail message and destroy all copies. Thank you. Use of e-mail Our communications to you may contain confidential information or information protected under solicitor-client privilege. Please advise if you wish us to use a mode of communication other than regular, unsecured e-mail in our communications with you. -------------------------------------------------------- Avis de confidentialite Ce message, transmis par courriel, est confidentiel, peut etre protege par le secret professionnel et est a l'usage exclusif du destinataire ci-dessus. Toute autre personne est par les presentes avisee qu'il lui est strictement interdit de le diffuser, le distribuer ou le reproduire. Si le destinataire ne peut etre joint ou vous est inconnu, veuillez informer l'expediteur par courrier electronique immediatement et detruire ce message et toute copie de celui-ci. Merci. Utilisation du courrier electronique Nos communications avec vous peuvent contenir des renseignements confidentiels ou proteges par le secret professionnel. Si vous desirez que nous communiquions avec vous par un autre moyen de transmission que le courrier electronique ordinaire non securise, veuillez nous en aviser. _______________________________________________ Cc-ca mailing list Cc-ca AT lists.ibiblio.org http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-ca _______________________________________________ Cc-ca mailing list Cc-ca AT lists.ibiblio.org http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-ca |
Attachment:
hpk excerpt re gold.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
-
[Cc-ca] Concerns: Copyright Act s. 57 and s. 14,
Kaplan-Myrth, Andy, 07/19/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [Cc-ca] Concerns: Copyright Act s. 57 and s. 14, Howard Knopf, 07/19/2004
- Re: [Cc-ca] Concerns: Copyright Act s. 57 and s. 14, Carys Craig/osgoode, 07/19/2004
- Re: [Cc-ca] Concerns: Copyright Act s. 57 and s. 14, Howard Knopf, 07/20/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.