A discussion of hybrid open source and proprietary licensing models.

[Marius Amado Alves <amado.alves AT netcabo.pt>]

> I particularly like the way CopyFlex, unlike my Share-revenues idea, 
> qualifies as open source under the OSI Open Source Definition.

Please point to the CopyFlex license. I looked around and did not find 
it. From what I did find, it seems no, it will not be OSI-compliant, it 
will probably breach clause 6 like the rest of us. But we need to see 
the license to know for sure.

For the record, I must say I'm not particularly interested in being 
OSI-compliant. But that's another (long) story.