Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-bizcom - Re: [Cc-bizcom] RE: Gates' assertions about copyright reform

cc-bizcom AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: A discussion of hybrid open source and proprietary licensing models.

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Marshall W. Van Alstyne" <marshall AT MIT.EDU>
  • To: Sigmascape1 AT cs.com, cc-bizcom AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Cc:
  • Subject: Re: [Cc-bizcom] RE: Gates' assertions about copyright reform
  • Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:48:37 -0500

Relative to Gates' missives about IP reformers, the NYT provided some interesting counterpoint based on IBM's move to open up several of its software patents to anyone doing open source development. While such patents are generally awful to begin with, it's a step in the right direction.

With respect to software, we often forget -- and Gates' seems to overlook -- that copyright was originally only 14 years, renewable only once. It's been extended not less than 4 times, and never for public benefit. It is currently absurdly long at author's life + 75 years or 95 yrs in the case of corporations. These lengths are well past the economically useful life of almost any information good and they clearly do not boost the incentives for creators who have passed away.

Makes one cranky just thinking about it.

see http://publishing.wsu.edu/publishing.wsu.edu_non_ssl/copyright/public_domain_duration/ for a few historical details.

MVA

At 01:03 PM 1/10/2005, Sigmascape1 AT cs.com wrote:
I realize that there has been, and will continue to be, a lot of discussion on this unfortunate story, but this is how I feel about it, and why I expect no less from Mr. Gates...

Microsoft does not enrich the cultural landscape with its products, and it never will. Microsoft uses patents and copyrights to make money, and that is certainly 100% legal. Where I have issue with Gates is his lack of understanding about what 'giving back' really means. If Gates understood the U.S. Constitution, he would realize that patents and copyrights are not perpetual, and that at some point, he and his company will have to 'give back.' By using flexible licensing, many 'give back' on a daily basis. Sort of meeting copyright law and the public domain halfway.

He may also be interested in why someone, anyone, would take some type of artistic work he or she created (software code, possibly) and wish to share it with the rest of the world. Basically, he misses the point that sharing creative works spawns new creative works, and it spawns new ways to make money. GNU/Linux is one of the great examples of how 'sharing' actually makes it easier to create and develop new works and products. Certainly the Creative Commons' licenses do this everyday, and I use them everyday. I know that my photos and digital art are being sampled, and in many cases, verbatim copies are being tossed around various P2P networks, and that's fine with me. I made the decision to 'give back' and I hope that others will as well.

Microsoft could be the most disliked company in the world, I don't know. I know it has to be in the top 10, and its place is well-deserved. Microsoft might be able to escape this top ten list if they were willing to engage the 'communists' they claim are attempting to thwart their business plans. The day when Gates and the believers in giving back break bread together will be a great day, and it would take MS off the top ten list.

MLF

>Message: 1
>Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:10:55 -0500
>From: Marshall Van Alstyne <marshall AT MIT.EDU>
>Subject: [Cc-bizcom] Gates & (c) reform
>To: cc-bizcom AT lists.ibiblio.org
>Message-ID: <6.0.0.22.2.20050110110900.03eee508 AT po10.mit.edu>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
>The following is a short & fun article on the Creative Commons response to
>Gates' assertions about copyright reform:
>
>http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,66209,00.html
>
>Happy new year.
>MVA
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Cc-bizcom mailing list
>Cc-bizcom AT lists.ibiblio.org
>http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-bizcom
>
>
>End of Cc-bizcom Digest, Vol 7, Issue 1
>***************************************
>
_______________________________________________
Cc-bizcom mailing list
Cc-bizcom AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-bizcom





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page