Baslinux mailing list

[baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org]

honest question... why 2.2 instead of 2.4?

On 14/03/07, baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org <baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org> wrote:
> Message from Steven
> ===================
>
> I've now had a close look at busybox 1.1, 1.2,
> 1.3 and 1.4 and none of them are suitable for
> a 2.2 kernel.  Busybox 1.0 still checks for a
> 2.2 kernel and bypasses code for 2.4 kernels.
> However, from version 1.1 the kernel check is
> gone and everyone gets 2.4 code.
>
> So, no new busybox for BasicLinux.  As long as
> we have a 2.2 kernel (which I like very much),
> the current busybox is the last one for us.
>
> Cheers,
> Steven
>
>
> -----------------------
> BasicLinux mailing list
> -----------------------
> http://www.basiclinux.com.ru
> http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/baslinux/
> ------------------------------------
> To exit, send subject=unsubscribe to
> baslinux-request AT lists.ibiblio.org


--
--
--sam
--
Web; http://mephitus.no-ip.org/
Skype; Mephitus
ICQ; 51687964
--
"When you've done something right, no one will be sure you've done
anything at all." -- Futurama
--