Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

baslinux - Re: [BL] busybox

baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Baslinux mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • To: baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [BL] busybox
  • Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:11:58 -0600

honest question... why 2.2 instead of 2.4?

On 14/03/07, baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org <baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org> wrote:
Message from Steven
===================

I've now had a close look at busybox 1.1, 1.2,
1.3 and 1.4 and none of them are suitable for
a 2.2 kernel. Busybox 1.0 still checks for a
2.2 kernel and bypasses code for 2.4 kernels.
However, from version 1.1 the kernel check is
gone and everyone gets 2.4 code.

So, no new busybox for BasicLinux. As long as
we have a 2.2 kernel (which I like very much),
the current busybox is the last one for us.

Cheers,
Steven


-----------------------
BasicLinux mailing list
-----------------------
http://www.basiclinux.com.ru
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/baslinux/
------------------------------------
To exit, send subject=unsubscribe to
baslinux-request AT lists.ibiblio.org



--
--
--sam
--
Web; http://mephitus.no-ip.org/
Skype; Mephitus
ICQ; 51687964
--
"When you've done something right, no one will be sure you've done
anything at all." -- Futurama
--




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page