Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Ecc 9:14

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: JimStinehart AT aol.com
  • To: dekruidnootjes AT eircom.net, pporta7 AT gmail.com
  • Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org, George.Athas AT moore.edu.au
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Ecc 9:14
  • Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:49:04 -0400 (EDT)

Chris Watts:

 

You wrote:  “I am reminded of the account in Genesis where Abraham, for example, sets off with just 500 of his servants and defeats 5 Kings, not one, but 5. That should really sum it all up for an appetizer.”

 

Not.

 

1.  Abram has the Hurrian number of armed men:  318.  Genesis 14: 14.  But don’t feel too bad about that, because Akhenaten’s father, pharaoh Amenhotep III, made a similar mistake.  He told everyone in Egypt that the Hurrian king of Mitanni/MDYN had sent him a Hurrian princess bride and 317 of her retainers, never realizing that to the Hurrians, the number that counted was the number of total women who were sent:  318.  Note also that Hurrian princeling IR-Heba of Jerusalem uses that same number, 318, at Amarna Letter EA 287: 55.  [By the way, regarding #2 below, although the dating of Amarna Letters is controversial, I myself date Amarna Letter EA 287 to Year 13.]

 

Why is all this important?  The early Hebrew author is deliberately portraying Abram as being as powerful as a Hurrian princeling in mid-14th century BCE Canaan.

 

2.  Abram did not defeat 5 kings.  It was the 4 “kings” [two of whom were mere princelings] who had taken Lot hostage.  And Abram merely rescued Lot and Lot’s wife and Lot’s daughters and the loot that had been taken from Sodom, rather than inflicting a definitive military defeat on 5 kings.

 

Why did the coalition of 4 kings, one of whom has a bona fide Hittite kingly name, “Tidal”, take Lot and Lot’s wife and Lot’s daughters hostage?  Lot had not participated in any fighting against them, so the motive was not revenge.  No ransom is ever mentioned, and if the Hittite-led coalition wanted ransom, they would certainly have left the bereaved wife and daughters of Lot in Sodom to beg for a ransom to be raised.

 

Here’s the historical explanation.  This famous story is coming directly from what happened in Year 13 historically, with “Year 13” being explicitly mentioned at Genesis 14: 4.  Mighty Hittite King Suppiluliuma, who had seized the Hittite throne by the ruthless expedient of murdering his own older brother named “Tidal” [so that the Biblical name “Tidal” is a nasty Patriarchal nickname that effectively calls the Hittite king “Murderer”], and who historically had 3 allies when operating in Syria [being the “4 kings” at Genesis 14: 1], hoped to do to Lot and Lot’s family what he had successfully done in or about Year 13 historically to Hurrian princeling Aitakkama and Aitakkama’s family regarding Qadesh-on-the-Orontes in southern Syria:  turn the man into a Hittite puppet, to be installed as the new leader of the prosperous city-state.

 

*       *       *

 

Just think Year 13 and the Hurrians, and suddenly chapter 14 of Genesis makes perfect sense historically.  Including the specific number 318.

 

Jim Stinehart

Evanston, Illinois




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page