Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 12:13

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Isaac Fried <if AT math.bu.edu>
  • To: Isaac Fried <if AT math.bu.edu>
  • Cc: "b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>, Hedrick Gary <GaryH AT cjfm.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 12:13
  • Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 11:39:19 -0400

It is, of course, addition, not edition. 

Isaac Fried, Boston University

On Jun 29, 2013, at 9:31 PM, Isaac Fried wrote:

Hebrew has two 'they', המה HEMAH, as in Ex. 19:13, contracted to הם HEM, as in Is. 65:24; and הנה HENAH, as in Gen. 33:6, later contracted to a mere הן HEN. 


Hebrew has chosen HEM to identify males, and HEN to identify females.


It appears to me that the Hebrew plural is formed by the edition to the noun of the personal pronoun HEM, say YAMIYM =YOM-HEM, 'days'. It stands to reason that there was a parallel plural form using HEN as in YAMIYN = YOM-HEN.


Other examples, brought by Jerry, are the צדונין of 1Ki. 11:33, the הרצין HA-RACIYN of 2Ki. 11:13, the חטין XITIYN, of Ezek. 4:9, and more.


Isaac Fried, Boston University


On Jun 26, 2013, at 10:33 PM, Hedrick Gary wrote:

 לקץ הימין

Why does the Hebrew text of Daniel 12:13 have qetz hayamin (with a final nun) instead of qetz hayamim (with a mem at the end). Shouldn't "end of days" be qetz hayamim?

Gary Hedrick
San Antonio, Texas USA



_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list

_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page