Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Ecclesiastes 6:9 “better than going ??”

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>
  • To: Pere Porta <pporta7 AT gmail.com>
  • Cc: B-Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Ecclesiastes 6:9 “better than going ??”
  • Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 13:42:21 -0800

Pere:

No I didn’t say “must be”, rather I said might be, and appears to be so. So unless a good argument from context proves that it isn’t, I’m leafing that open as a possibility.

So what contextual clues are you using to say that it isn’t?

Karl W. Randolph.

On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Pere Porta <pporta7 AT gmail.com> wrote:
Karl,
 
after all the posts you, me and other list members have sent on the issue HLK-NP$ in Ecc 6:9, are you still thinking that NP$ must be a Niphal form?
 
Kind regards,
 
Pere Porta



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page