Biblical Hebrew Forum

[K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>]

Pere:

No I didn’t say “must be”, rather I said might be, and appears to be so. So unless a good argument from context proves that it isn’t, I’m leafing that open as a possibility.

So what contextual clues are you using to say that it isn’t?

Karl W. Randolph.

On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Pere Porta <pporta7 AT gmail.com> wrote:

Karl,

 

after all the posts you, me and other list members have sent on the issue HLK-NP$ in Ecc 6:9, are you still thinking that NP$ must be a Niphal form?

 

Kind regards,

 

Pere Porta