Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Noun in -WT

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Pere Porta <pporta7 AT gmail.com>
  • To: Isaac Fried <if AT math.bu.edu>
  • Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Noun in -WT
  • Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:50:48 +0200

Isaac, Karl, Randall,

>From now I'll be away from home till next Tuesday. 26.
If you have any questions or issues that you'd like me to say something on
them, please, post them next Monday.

Friendly,

Pere Porta
(Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain)


2011/4/21 Isaac Fried <if AT math.bu.edu>

> The attached personal pronouns (PP) are not (NOT!) the separate ones. All
> we have to know about the attached PP is:
>
> 1. That they are PP.
> 2. What or who is referred.
>
> He who knows Hebrew knows that the U in XAN-U is for the parkers.
> He who knows Hebrew knows that XAN-U-T is a store and that XAN-IY-T is a
> spear.
> He who knows Hebrew knows that K-O-S is a cup, that K-IY-S is a pocket, and
> that K-U-S is another cup-shaped thing (into colloquial Hebrew from Arabic).
>
> Isaac Fried, Boston University
>
> On Apr 20, 2011, at 11:49 PM, Pere Porta wrote:
>
> Isaac,
>
> if sound U refers to HW), he...... how do you explain, within your theory,
> that SGRW means -as you write yourself- "they locked" and not "he
> locked"?
>
> Same queston about XANU, they encamped: why not "he encamped"?
>
>
> Pere Porta
> (Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain)
>
>
>


--
Pere Porta




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page