b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>
- To: fred burlingame <tensorpath AT gmail.com>
- Cc: Hebrew List <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] be-ne vs. ve-ne
- Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 21:44:38 -0800
Fred:
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Paul Zellmer <pzellmer AT sc.rr.com> wrote:
> …
> To put this in more technical terminology, your stated opinion of your own
> question looks at the Masoretic markings as being prescriptive when they
> were actually descriptive. They were following the sounds of the language
> as they actually heard, without regard for *why* the sounds were pronounced
> that way.
>
> …
> Paul Zellmer
>
> I’ll add to what Paul said, in that we don’t know how Biblical Hebrew was
pronounced when it was the language of the street and hearth. The Masoretic
points only indicate a local dialect of Hebrew as it was spoken at the
Masoretic time. And I accept it as descriptive rather than prescriptive.
Karl W. Randolph.
-
[b-hebrew] be-ne vs. ve-ne,
fred burlingame, 12/27/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] be-ne vs. ve-ne,
AMK Judaica, 12/27/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] be-ne vs. ve-ne,
fred burlingame, 12/27/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] be-ne vs. ve-ne,
Paul Zellmer, 12/27/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] be-ne vs. ve-ne, K Randolph, 12/28/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] be-ne vs. ve-ne, Yigal Levin, 12/28/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] be-ne vs. ve-ne, fred burlingame, 12/28/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] be-ne vs. ve-ne,
Paul Zellmer, 12/27/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] be-ne vs. ve-ne,
fred burlingame, 12/27/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] be-ne vs. ve-ne,
AMK Judaica, 12/27/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.