b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: fred burlingame <tensorpath AT gmail.com>
- To: Kevin Riley <klriley AT alphalink.com.au>
- Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Was the NT for public consumption?
- Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:57:54 -0600
a slight difference between:
a. hearing the expert read the document; and
b. reading the document oneself.
regards,
fred burlingame
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Kevin Riley <klriley AT alphalink.com.au>wrote:
> So, all Paul's letters that he intended should be read in church were 'not
> for public consumption'? I guess it depends on what you mean by 'public'?
> I would have thought that manuscripts intended to be read in public on a
> regular basis would qualify, but perhaps not. Does one need to be able to
> read in order to 'consume'?
>
> Kevin Riley
>
>
> On 24/12/2010 3:37 AM, fred burlingame wrote:
>
>> and the same answer applies.
>>
>> before the printing press, only the rich, the gov't., and the church
>> possessed books; because of the cost.
>>
>> http://www.ehow.com/facts_4924257_how-printing-press-changed-world.html
>>
>> hence, the new testament in writing was manufactured not ... for
>> common public consumption.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> fred burlingame
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Uri Hurwitz<uhurwitz AT yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> Since the NT contains many citations from the Hebrew
>>> Bible, though in Greek translation, the new question in the
>>> subject above seems justified, even in this list.
>>>
>>> The answer to it should shed much light on the previous
>>> question regarding public consumption.
>>>
>>> Season's Greetings,
>>>
>>> Uri Hurwitz Great Neck, NY
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> b-hebrew mailing list
>>> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
>>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> b-hebrew mailing list
>> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>
-
[b-hebrew] Was the NT for public consumption?,
Uri Hurwitz, 12/23/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Was the NT for public consumption?,
fred burlingame, 12/23/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Was the NT for public consumption?,
Kevin Riley, 12/23/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Was the NT for public consumption?,
fred burlingame, 12/23/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Was the NT for public consumption?,
dwashbur, 12/23/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Was the NT for public consumption?,
fred burlingame, 12/23/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Was the NT for public consumption?,
dwashbur, 12/23/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] Was the NT for public consumption?, fred burlingame, 12/24/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] Was the NT for public consumption?, dwashbur, 12/24/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Was the NT for public consumption?,
dwashbur, 12/23/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Was the NT for public consumption?,
fred burlingame, 12/23/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Was the NT for public consumption?,
dwashbur, 12/23/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Was the NT for public consumption?,
fred burlingame, 12/23/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Was the NT for public consumption?,
Kevin Riley, 12/23/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Was the NT for public consumption?,
fred burlingame, 12/23/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.