b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>
- To: fred burlingame <tensorpath AT gmail.com>
- Cc: B-Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] olam
- Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:22:25 -0800
Fred:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 7:38 PM, fred burlingame <tensorpath AT gmail.com>wrote:
> theology can attach to all things.
>
Of course, but irrelevant to this forum.
>
> in so far as you can divorce theology from any thing, however, so can i.
>
Then please do so.
>
> i suggested hebrew was a time based language. you contested that
> conclusion.
>
>From a linguistic standpoint, Biblical Hebrew lacks the structures that
indicate tense and aspect, the two ways of measuring time found in other
languages. Therefore, from a linguistic standpoint, it is not a time based
language.
> i responded with comments describing our universe as one consisting
> of three dimensions of space and one of time. I then compared it to another
> possible universe that possesses not those dimensions. that's not theology.
> that's just discussion of different universes.
>
This, your response, is theology.
>
> regards,
>
> fred burlingame
>
> Karl W. Randolph.
-
Re: [b-hebrew] olam,
Nir cohen - Prof. Mat., 12/19/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] olam,
fred burlingame, 12/19/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] olam,
K Randolph, 12/19/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] olam,
fred burlingame, 12/19/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] olam,
K Randolph, 12/19/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] olam,
fred burlingame, 12/19/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] olam, Arnaud Fournet, 12/20/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] olam, K Randolph, 12/20/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] olam,
fred burlingame, 12/19/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] olam,
K Randolph, 12/19/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] olam,
fred burlingame, 12/19/2010
-
Message not available
- Re: [b-hebrew] figurative vs. literal, fred burlingame, 12/19/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] olam,
K Randolph, 12/19/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] olam,
fred burlingame, 12/19/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.