b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>
- To: fred burlingame <tensorpath AT gmail.com>
- Cc: B-Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] olam
- Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 10:39:41 -0800
Fred:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:07 AM, fred burlingame <tensorpath AT gmail.com>wrote:
> i see it
>
> you see it
>
> even isaiah sees ...
>
> a time based language ...
>
You need to distinguish between the structure of the language, and the ideas
expressed by the speakers and writers of that language.
Biblical Hebrew is timeless, in that its grammar expresses neither tense nor
aspect, the means by which languages express time. It is not a time based
language.
>
> …
> plenty people see daniel's aramaic language as not the language of יבשתא in
> daniel 2:10; but rather the language of another universe.
>
(brow furled in puzzlement) What in the world do you mean by that? It makes
absolutely no sense.
>
> regards,
>
> fred burlingame
>
> Karl W. Randolph.
-
Re: [b-hebrew] olam,
Nir cohen - Prof. Mat., 12/19/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] olam,
fred burlingame, 12/19/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] olam,
K Randolph, 12/19/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] olam,
fred burlingame, 12/19/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] olam,
K Randolph, 12/19/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] olam,
fred burlingame, 12/19/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] olam, Arnaud Fournet, 12/20/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] olam, K Randolph, 12/20/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] olam,
fred burlingame, 12/19/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] olam,
K Randolph, 12/19/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] olam,
fred burlingame, 12/19/2010
-
Message not available
- Re: [b-hebrew] figurative vs. literal, fred burlingame, 12/19/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] olam,
K Randolph, 12/19/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] olam,
fred burlingame, 12/19/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.