Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - [b-hebrew] HALOT Etymologies

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: JimStinehart AT aol.com
  • To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [b-hebrew] HALOT Etymologies
  • Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 13:58:30 EST


HALOT Etymologies

We are often told that HALOT’s etymologies of Biblical Hebrew words and
names are the finest that have ever been done in 3,000 years. Yet when I
look
in HALOT for etymologies of some of my favorite Biblical names, here is what
I find:

1. (N-R at Genesis 14: 13: “n.m.” Is that the finest etymology ever
done of this Biblical name?

2. QNZ-Y at Genesis 15: 19: “name of a tribe, meaning unexplained”. That
’s the finest etymology there is?

3. XTY at Genesis 15: 20: “cun[eiform] Xatti…Hittites in Palestine:
earlier population of the land, after the Assyrian name for Syria and
Palestine
in a wider sense”. Did they really say “Hittites in Palestine”? Are they
serious?

4. (PR-WN at Genesis 23: 8: “n.m. of a Hittite”. That’s the best
etymology out there?

5. $N(-R at Genesis 14: 2: “$in(ar is the land of $anxar(a) in Syria, and
was first used as a secondary expression for $umeru Sumer at a time when
$anxar was not used as the name of a country”. Really? $N(-R is “Sumer”,
but means “Syria”?

6. BR$( at Genesis 14: 2: “Arabic…ugly”. That’s the b-e-s-t
etymology out there?

7. $M)BR at Genesis 14: 2: “the meaning of the personal name is not
established”.

How can university scholars consider HALOT to be the gold standard for
etymologies regarding Biblical names like the above? Isn’t it clear that
HALOT
has no idea whatsoever what the actual etymology is for any of the above 7
names?

Jim Stinehart
Evanston, Illinois




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page