b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
Re: [b-hebrew] Greek Translation of Isaiah (was hellenization)
- From: "Jack Kilmon" <jkilmon AT historian.net>
- To: "fred burlingame" <tensorpath AT gmail.com>, "George Athas" <George.Athas AT moore.edu.au>
- Cc: B-Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Greek Translation of Isaiah (was hellenization)
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:21:27 -0500
I can see what is coming:
First, the translated Hebrew Matthew Ibn Shaprut used in the Evan Bohan was not his. It had been translated into Hebrew from a Middle Dutch Liege Harmony at least 50 years prior in archaeized Hebrew by a Hebrew competent Christian. Where there is deviation syntactically or lexically can only be attributed to the archetype/exemplar or the translator and NOT to canonical Matthew which was
composed in Greek in the late 1st century. Stylistically, Shem-Tob's text of Matthew is written in Biblical Hebrew with a healthy mixture of MISHNAIC HEBREW and LATER rabbinic vocabulary...."
ERGO...this is is a medieval translation of an ancient text in medieval style. There is no other conclusion that can remain within the boundaries of good text critical scholarship and common sense.
If you read Howard closely, he is a bit cagey on this since his book was his 15 minutes of fame but he does not say what you are about to claim. I suspect you want to extend Professor Howard's case for this document beyond that which he himself would claim. The Shem Tob Matthew is NOT an "original" Matthew and is NOT proof of a Hebrew New Testament. There may well have been some text types available in Medieval Europe....even to the Vetus Latina and Dutch Liege traditions....that are no longer extant and these text type(s) may well have preserved some more "primitive" readings in much
the case as Codex Bezae that make provocative Hebraisms in the text of Shem Tob HMt a result of retroversion rather than a Hebrew mss "preserved" since very early times. Codes Bezae is 5th
century and there are parallels to the Evan Bohan text which is medieval and NOT ancient.
Jack Kilmon
--------------------------------------------------
From: "fred burlingame" <tensorpath AT gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 9:44 AM
To: "George Athas" <George.Athas AT moore.edu.au>
Cc: "B-Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Greek Translation of Isaiah (was hellenization)
Hello George:
Sounds good to me, putting this thread, to bed.
Just for future reference, (merely as a procedural question; and not for
substantive discussion now), does the shem tov manuscript fit within the
boundaries of posting at this forum?
http://www.torahresource.com/Dutillet.html
Or does the masoretic text form the general course and scope of discussion
here?
Regards,
fred burlingame
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 11:50 PM, George Athas <George.Athas AT moore.edu.au>wrote:
Fred, you are entitled to your opinion, though I suspect that many will_______________________________________________
disagree with you about language being unable to capture cultural
conceptuality. Yes, there is always some loss, but this is not complete
loss. It seems you are implying wholesale change of meaning when translation
occurs, perhaps because you are equating culture with language directly.
This may be the way Islam views translation of the Qur’an, but it does so on
the basis of a belief in the divine origin and unalterability of the words,
syllables, and sounds as delivered directly to Muhammad. While Second Temple
Judaism viewed the biblical texts as divine in origin, they evidently had no
insuperable objection to translating them (perhaps because their concept of
divine inspiration was not identical to the way Islam later viewed
inspiration of the Qur’an).
I’m not sure this thread is going to deal with Biblical Hebrew in any
significant way. Let’s give it to the end of Monday and then leave it there.
GEORGE ATHAS
Co-Moderator, B-Hebrew
(Sydney, Australia)
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Greek Translation of Isaiah (was hellenization),
TedBro, 10/17/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] Greek Translation of Isaiah (was hellenization), fred burlingame, 10/17/2010
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Greek Translation of Isaiah (was hellenization),
TedBro, 10/17/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Greek Translation of Isaiah (was hellenization),
fred burlingame, 10/17/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Greek Translation of Isaiah (was hellenization),
George Athas, 10/18/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Greek Translation of Isaiah (was hellenization),
fred burlingame, 10/18/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] Greek Translation of Isaiah (was hellenization), Jack Kilmon, 10/18/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Greek Translation of Isaiah (was hellenization),
fred burlingame, 10/18/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Greek Translation of Isaiah (was hellenization),
George Athas, 10/18/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Greek Translation of Isaiah (was hellenization),
fred burlingame, 10/17/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.