b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
[b-hebrew] Are all 5 of these variants of YHWH all supposed to be read as Elohiym?
- From: davedonnelly1 <davedonnelly1 AT juno.com>
- To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [b-hebrew] Are all 5 of these variants of YHWH all supposed to be read as Elohiym?
- Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:16:30 -0500
Ive been studying 5 different variants of YHVH that occur in the
Leningrad Codex.
All 5 of these variants of YHVH differ from each other, and all 5 of
these variants of YHVH follow adonai in the particular verses that they
occur in.
They look to me that they might all be Qere readings that were meant to
be read as Elohiym.
Did the Masoretes who wrote the Leningrad Codex of 1008-1010 A.D. point
these particular five variants of YHVH, as they are pointed, to
specifically advise the Jewish reader to read Elohiym.
I have provided links to all five of these variants of YHVH, to show
that each one of them follows Adonai in the on line Leningrad Codex. Note
that in the Ben Chayyim Hebrew Text of 1525 A.D. only one of these
variants occurs, but it occurs 305 times
1. Judges 16:28 http://www.tanach.us/Tanach.xml#Judg16:28-16:28
I choose to call this variant the perfect Qere reading for Elohiym.
This is the variant that occurs 305 time in the Ben Chayyim Hebrew Text
of 1525 A.D. and has the precise same vowels as are found in Elohiym.
[Yod-hatef segol-heh-holem-vav-hireq-heh]
#2. Joshua 7:7 http://www.tanach.us/Tanach.xml#Josh7:7-7:7
[Yod-shewa-heh-vav-hireq-heh]
#3. 1 Kings 2:26 http://www.tanach.us/Tanach.xml#1 Kings2:26-2:26
[Yod-shewa-heh-holem-vav-hireq-heh]
#4. Genesis 15:2 http://www.tanach.us/Tanach.xml#Gen15:2-15:2
[Yod-hatef segol-heh-vav-hireq-heh]
#5. Ezekial 24:24 http://www.tanach.us/Tanach.xml#Ezek24:24-24:24
[Yod-shewa-heh-vav-hireq-heh]
Dave Donnelly
____________________________________________________________
Banking
Click here to find the perfect banking opportunity!
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/c?cp=HV7IKMkkkshF1_dRNYiNDAAAJ1BVGyITH_OGb159rldJgo3SAAYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADNAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAXeAAAAAA=
>From kwrandolph AT gmail.com Fri Jan 1 17:57:43 2010
Return-Path: <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>
X-Original-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix, from userid 3002)
id 69A8F4C013; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:57:43 -0500 (EST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on malecky
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.4 required=5.0 tests=FH_DATE_PAST_20XX,
HTML_MESSAGE
autolearn=disabled version=3.2.3
Received: from mail-yx0-f188.google.com (mail-yx0-f188.google.com
[209.85.210.188])
by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B758A4C012
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:57:42 -0500
(EST)
Received: by yxe26 with SMTP id 26so12913235yxe.4
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 14:57:42 -0800
(PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.120.41 with SMTP id s41mr20438700ybc.327.1262386662394;
Fri, 01 Jan 2010 14:57:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <3910bdd80912302217s69cb706exe514ed5b0deae36c AT mail.gmail.com>
References: <3910bdd80912302217s69cb706exe514ed5b0deae36c AT mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 14:57:42 -0800
Message-ID: <acd782171001011457s3608b73dx8dadba695d9dbbb7 AT mail.gmail.com>
From: K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>
To: B-Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.9
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] MI- nouns
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Biblical Hebrew Forum <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:57:43 -0000
Pere:
I don=E2=80=99t consider these nouns to have a M- prefix, other than that b=
rought
about by being the piel, pual, hiphil or hophal participles, treated as
nouns. The forms follow the grammatical rules for the conjugations of
participles.
As for their meanings, they refer to people, objects, actions or places
connected with the actions denoted by the verbs. Hence a M)HB is a lover,
MZKYR a recorder, a type of secretary, MBW(H a flowing spring, MB+ an
expectation, MB+) a rash utterance, MKTT a smithy for metal work, and so on=
.
Karl W. Randolph.
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Pere Porta <pporta7 AT gmail.com> wrote:
> There are in Hebrew, and of course in the Hebrew bible, many nouns that
> have
> been formed form a three letter base to which *MI*- has been prefixed.
> And so, *MI*ZRFX, *sunrise, east* (1Ch 5:10) or *MI*KTFB, *a writing* (2C=
h
> 21:12).
> I'm doing a research about the real meaning of *MI*- and I'm wondering:
>
> 1. Does *MI-* always -or nearly always- mean "the place" where the thing
> happens? This is clear for *MI*ZRFX, the place where the sun rises, and
> also
> for MIDBFR, wilderness (Dt 32:10) (the place where the DFBFR, the word
> takes
> place?), MINZFR, monastery (the place where the consecration is
> fulfilled)...but not for *MI*KTFB, a writing (and not a writing desk or a
> bureau...).
> 2. Could we say that this prefix means too the result or effect of the ro=
ot
> concept being fulfilled as it is the case in *MI*KTFB, a writing or
> *MI*MC),
> a finding?
> 3. If 1. and 2. are true, maybe this prefix could also be someting else? =
I
> mean: that by prefixing this *MI-* to several root types a meaning other
> than "place" and "result/effect" would result?
> 4. Would this *MI-* be in some way related to preposition MIN, from (or,
> less probably, to pronoun MY, who)? Or it rather would be something quite
> different from MIN and from MY? In this last case, what would it then be?
>
> Pere Porta
> (Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain)
>
-
[b-hebrew] Are all 5 of these variants of YHWH all supposed to be read as Elohiym?,
davedonnelly1, 01/01/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Are all 5 of these variants of YHWH all supposed to be read as Elohiym?,
Christopher Kimball, 01/03/2010
- [b-hebrew] URLs (Was re: Are all 5 of these ...), Joel C. Salomon, 01/03/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Are all 5 of these variants of YHWH all supposed to be read as Elohiym?,
Christopher Kimball, 01/03/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.