b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Uri Hurwitz <uhurwitz AT yahoo.com>
- To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [b-hebrew] Clarification - was qohelet
- Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:08:00 -0700 (PDT)
Dear Rolf,
Let me briefly revisit pre-exilic extra-biblical Hebrew inscriptions: the
Yabneh-Yam document, the Lachish and Arad letters, and many others are
contemporary witnesses of Hebrew the way it was used. Naturally it would
have been better if more was available, but given the material as it exists
so far, it is indispensable evidence about the living language. As is well
known, much significant, paleographic, historical and religious knowledge is
derived from this corpus, modest as it may be. It is vital, and does not
deserve a dismissive attitude.
For comparison let us look at the Mesha Stella. This thirty three or four
line inscription served for decades as practically the only source for
Moabite. Nobody complained about the paucity of evidence in this case..
The Heb. inscriptions are therefore a legitimate part of the discussion
whether or not one can find indications of Mishnaic usage at that stage of
the language. Let us keep in mind that the argument is not whether Qohelet
was written in biblical Heb.or not, but whether there are in the book markers
of later development of the language, in contrast to what most consider
earlier books. The very high usage of "she..." 67 times, compared with 89
"asher" alone points clearly to its late date.
Comparisons with Phoenician, Ugaritic or Akkadian are always important but
really of much lesser relevance here, for the the simple reason that one
needs to compare first diverse linguistic elements in the language under
discussion, in this case Hebrew.
And to introduce a totally different point: Yes, we are discussing words,
but is it methodically right to ignore the content which the words form?
In this case we have the evidence of dialogue, or direct speech, with
which authors of many texts in HB books embellished their narrative, such as
"Am I my brother's keeper?"
This was done for various reasons, but the overriding one was to
introduce the drama of live conversation in a style familiar and natural to
the audiences. None of the markers of Late Hebrew can be found there.
Regards,
Uri Hurwitz
- [b-hebrew] Clarification - was qohelet, Uri Hurwitz, 09/21/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.