Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - [b-hebrew] Clarification - was qohelet

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Uri Hurwitz <uhurwitz AT yahoo.com>
  • To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [b-hebrew] Clarification - was qohelet
  • Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:08:00 -0700 (PDT)

    Dear Rolf,  
   
   Let me briefly revisit  pre-exilic extra-biblical Hebrew inscriptions: the
Yabneh-Yam document, the Lachish and Arad letters, and many others are
contemporary witnesses of Hebrew the way it was used.  Naturally it would
have been better if more was available, but given the material as it exists
so far, it is  indispensable evidence about  the  living language. As is well
known, much significant, paleographic, historical and religious knowledge is
derived from this corpus, modest as it may be. It is vital, and does not
deserve a dismissive attitude.

  For comparison let us look at the Mesha Stella. This thirty three or four
line inscription served for decades as practically the only source for
Moabite. Nobody complained about the paucity of evidence in this case..

  The Heb. inscriptions are therefore a legitimate part of the discussion
whether or not one can find indications of Mishnaic usage at that stage of
the language. Let us keep in mind that the argument is not whether Qohelet
was written in biblical Heb.or not, but whether there are in the book markers
of  later development of the language, in contrast to  what most consider 
earlier books. The very high usage of "she..." 67 times, compared  with  89
"asher" alone points clearly to its late date.

  Comparisons with Phoenician, Ugaritic or Akkadian  are always important but
really of much lesser relevance here, for the the simple reason that one
needs to compare first diverse linguistic elements in the language under
discussion, in this case Hebrew.

   And to introduce a totally different point: Yes, we are discussing words,
but is it methodically right to ignore the content which the words form?  
   
    In this case we have the evidence of dialogue, or direct speech, with
which authors of many texts in HB books embellished  their narrative, such as
"Am I my brother's keeper?"
    This was done for various reasons, but the overriding one was to
introduce the drama of live conversation in a style familiar and natural to
the audiences. None of the markers of Late Hebrew can be found there.

   Regards,

  Uri Hurwitz

















  • [b-hebrew] Clarification - was qohelet, Uri Hurwitz, 09/21/2009

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page