Biblical Hebrew Forum

[Rolf Furuli <furuli AT online.no>]

Dear Yitzhaq,

I have never said that dynamicty cannot be cancelled, but I have said 
that in verbs *marked* for dynamicity, dynamicity cannet be 
cancelled. For example, the verb $yR will in any context be dynamic 
and durative. So, your example is irrelevant to my theory.

Best regards,

Rolf Furuli
University of Oslo



> Dear Rolf,
>
> I don't know if you saw it or not, but within the discussion of
> "plod", I also pointed out something that essentially challenges
> your claims that dynamicity cannot be cancelled.  This is the
> use in BH of nzl 'flow'/'pour' in Exodus 15:8 where it appears
> to refer as a participle to something that is not flowing.  It
> appears that its dynamicity is cancelled by other parts of
> the sentence such as 'nd' and 'ncbw'.  How does your theory
> account for this?
>
> Yitzhak Sapir
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew