Biblical Hebrew Forum

[Yitzhak Sapir <yitzhaksapir AT gmail.com>]

Dear Rolf,

I don't know if you saw it or not, but within the discussion of
"plod", I also pointed out something that essentially challenges
your claims that dynamicity cannot be cancelled.  This is the
use in BH of nzl 'flow'/'pour' in Exodus 15:8 where it appears
to refer as a participle to something that is not flowing.  It
appears that its dynamicity is cancelled by other parts of
the sentence such as 'nd' and 'ncbw'.  How does your theory
account for this?

Yitzhak Sapir