b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
Re: [b-hebrew] Tolodoth theory and the date of Genesis 2:4-4:26
- From: James Read <J.Read-2 AT sms.ed.ac.uk>
- To: K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>
- Cc: B-Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Tolodoth theory and the date of Genesis 2:4-4:26
- Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 19:12:07 +0100
Hi,
Quoting K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>:
James:
It looks as if you don’t understand simple English either.
Further your timeline below leaves out a couple of events that impinge on
this discussion:
Between Eden episode and flood there was spreading out of population and
naming of pre-flood geography.
You're reading this into the text Karl. It simply isn't there. At least, not explicitly, at any rate. You are applying circular logic to back up your theory.
So what part of “reuse” do you not understand?
Reuse of what? Places were named for a purpose. The purpose of naming the place Cush was that it was inhabited by the offspring of the family head Cush. You are reading things into the text that simply aren't there. How can you possibly be expected to be taken seriously when you continue to do this? All you are achieving is convincing me that the only thing that matters to you is to prove the theory right and you are willing to interpret *everything* else around this as if it was some kind of fundamental truth. This approach isn't doing you or your theory any favours.
James Christian
P.S. I appreciate that this is a subject that you feel strongly about but please change your tone. Let's try and keep this discussion impersonal and objective so that it can value for anybody who reads the archives.
Karl W. Randolph.
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:43 AM, James Read <J.Read-2 AT sms.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
_______________________________________________
Hi,
----->eden episode----->flood------>birth of Cush-->naming of
Cush--->naming the land after Cush because that's where his offspring lived.
Please show me how your reuse hypothesis fits into the above timeline.
James Christian
Quoting K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>:
James:
What part of “reuse” do you not understand?
Karl W. Randolph.
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:34 AM, James Read <J.Read-2 AT sms.ed.ac.uk>
wrote:
Hi,
b-hebrew mailing list
Quoting K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>:
James:
I just decided not to answer one of your postings in another thread that????????????????????????
you
started because your answer indicates ignorance of Hebrew language and
poetry.
As a group, we have had other discussions where the reuse of names for
new
places and people was an issue, and this is no different. Just because
the
post-flood land of Cush was named after one of Ham’s sons does not rule
out
that this was a reuse of a pre-flood name for a new place. The same with
Assyria.
Am I going to have to draw a time line?
James Christian
This whole argument is a non-starter.
Karl W. Randolph.
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:08 AM, James Read <J.Read-2 AT sms.ed.ac.uk>
wrote:
No it isn't a non-starter.
b-hebrew mailing list
The land of Cush was named after Cush the son of Ham (he hadn't been
born
yet)
Assyria was named after Asshur the son of Shem (he hadn't been born yet
either)
Please, stop sidestepping the issues and face them head on if you wish
your
theory to be taken seriously at any level.
James Christian
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
-
[b-hebrew] Tolodoth theory and the date of Genesis 2:4-4:26,
James Read, 05/19/2009
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Tolodoth theory and the date of Genesis 2:4-4:26,
K Randolph, 05/19/2009
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Tolodoth theory and the date of Genesis 2:4-4:26,
James Read, 05/19/2009
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Tolodoth theory and the date of Genesis 2:4-4:26,
K Randolph, 05/19/2009
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Tolodoth theory and the date of Genesis 2:4-4:26,
James Read, 05/19/2009
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Tolodoth theory and the date of Genesis 2:4-4:26,
K Randolph, 05/19/2009
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Tolodoth theory and the date of Genesis 2:4-4:26,
James Read, 05/19/2009
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tolodoth theory and the date of Genesis 2:4-4:26, K Randolph, 05/19/2009
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tolodoth theory and the date of Genesis 2:4-4:26, James Read, 05/19/2009
- [b-hebrew] THREAD CLOSED: Tolodoth theory and the date of Genesis 2:4-4:26, George Athas, 05/19/2009
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Tolodoth theory and the date of Genesis 2:4-4:26,
James Read, 05/19/2009
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Tolodoth theory and the date of Genesis 2:4-4:26,
K Randolph, 05/19/2009
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Tolodoth theory and the date of Genesis 2:4-4:26,
James Read, 05/19/2009
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Tolodoth theory and the date of Genesis 2:4-4:26,
K Randolph, 05/19/2009
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Tolodoth theory and the date of Genesis 2:4-4:26,
James Read, 05/19/2009
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Tolodoth theory and the date of Genesis 2:4-4:26,
K Randolph, 05/19/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.